Such issues as racial, social and religious diversity, the differences in life quality between various social layers, negative financial outcomes of capitalistic economy, as well as a lack of equality and feminism related problems are very commonly chosen as topics for analytic articles, critical writings, or academic works. Feminism is a social movement that promotes equality of women and men in all aspects of our life. Historically, men and women are having slightly different social, moral, religious, and other roles in the society. Men are traditionally hunters-gatherers who were supposed to bring home foods and provide the family with everything necessary for normal living.
As well, along with the notions of feminism often follow the subjects of class distinctions and boundaries. At the beginning of the 19th century, little opportunity existed for women, and thus many of them felt uncomfortable when attempting to enter many parts of society.
The absence of advanced educational opportunities for women and their alienation from almost all fields of work gave them little option in life: Although today a tutor may be considered a fairly high class and intellectual job, in the Victorian era a governess was little more than a servant who was paid to share her scarce amount of knowledge in limited fields to a child.
With little respect, security, or class one may certainly feel that an intelligent, passionate and opinionated young woman such as Jane Eyre should deserve and be capable of so much more. The insecurity of this position, being tossed around with complete disregard for her feelings or preferences, is only one of many grueling characteristics of this occupation.
However for Jane to even emerge into society, becoming a governess seemed the only reasonable path for her. The women of the Victorian Era can be regarded as the first group to do battle for the equality of the sexes. Feminism was not outright spoken of in this time, rather passed through literature, such as this very novel.
Stories and novels were the primary means in which to communicate information and ideas in that time. Without mass communication systems books were the few information carrying devices to cross borders, and encompass lands whenever people traveled.
They argue that the use of a women was simply so Bronte could relate to the main character, not to prove any point in regards to equality of men and of women.
Do you think I am an automation? Do you think because I am poor, obscure, plain, and little, I am soul and heartless? He asks them whether or not a Jew will bleed when pricked, or whether or not they experience emotion, or have dimensions.
Just as his famous speech is one for the equality of the races, this quote is one for the equality of the sexes. Showing that as a women she is no different from him, and thus should be treated no differently is evidently attempting the same effect as Shylock in The Merchant of Venice.
Jane Eyre lived a hard life, filled with hatred and anger. However, her ability to overcome all of this shows her strength, a power that women such as Blanche Ingram or the other superficial women would not posses. Her ability to comfort the aunt who had once treated her terribly is more power than some people could ever hope to obtain.
Though the death of her good friend Helen did effect Jane deeply, her maturation throughout the novel gives her the ability to cope with disaster more readily. When she found out that the man she loved was already married, she was able to control herself better than many men would ever be able to.
However, she was still able to break free. Though her leaving could be interpreted in many ways: Though it took strength to leave Rochester, it was not simply through this strength that she acted.
We are able to see that in fact she felt terribly. This may have been used to express that though the two sexes should be treated equally, their differences do exist.
The emotional side of females is thoroughly shown in this quotation. Jane appears to have been almost completely taken away by these feelings, whereas Rochester not so much.
Though this is left up to the reader to decide, as with many other aspects of this novel, it appears to me that Bronte is attempting to express the feminine side of Jane.
This is one of the few times in the novel when we get such a close look at the female side of Jane, and thus allows us to reevaluate our gender specific thinking. The novel Jane Eyre is one that can be interpreted in many different ways.
No definite resolution is ever seen upon whether Bronte meant to judge to sexual placement of that time, however as in many other novels the analysis is left up to the reader and thus will vary from person to person.
Though I may see this novel as one full of passages criticizing the gender specific fiber of that time, others may see it as simply an every day experiences of a governess who falls in love with a man who is already married.However, if you are discussing, for example, the historical context in which the episode originally aired, you should cite the full date.
Because you are specifying the date of airing, you would then use WB Television Network (rather than Mutant Enemy), because it was the network (rather than the production company) that aired the episode on the date you’re citing.
[Content warning: Discussion of social justice, discussion of violence, spoilers for Jacqueline Carey books.] [Edit 10/ This post was inspired by a debate with a friend of a friend on Facebook who has since become somewhat famous. Feminism has been a prominent and controversial topic in writings for the past two centuries.
With novels such as Jane Austen's Pride and Prejudice, or even William Shakespeare's Macbeth the fascination over this subject by authors is evident.
Western political philosophy from the start of the 20th century. Nineteenth-century European civilization had been the first to dominate and pervade the whole world and to create a new self-sustaining productivity in which all eventually might share.
That seems different, though, because it requires rejecting one ideology/ingroup, namely Catholicism. It makes sense that people identifying as Catholic would resent that the Protestants found a way to weaken Catholicism, and apparently people who “took the soup” were ostracized.
Contemporary Metaphilosophy. What is philosophy? What is philosophy for? How should philosophy be done? These are metaphilosophical questions, metaphilosophy being the study of the nature of philosophy.