Fiction T - English - Words: Death is never the solution to a problem; all it does is cover up the problem and act like an answer. The death penalty should be done away with because no one has the "right" to take someone else's life.
Posted on February 23, by Scott Alexander [Content warning: Discussion of social justice, discussion of violence, spoilers for Jacqueline Carey books. This post was inspired by a debate with a friend of a friend on Facebook who has since become somewhat famous.
Andrew Cord criticizes me for my bold and controversial suggestion that maybe people should try to tell slightly fewer blatant hurtful lies: And then complain about losing rather than changing their tactics to match those of people who are winning.
That post [ the one debunking false rape statistics ] is exactly my problem with Scott. It honestly makes me kind of sick.
In other words, if a fight is important to you, fight nasty. If that means lying, lie. If that means insults, insult. If that means silencing people, silence. But in a way, that would be assuming the conclusion.
Then if the stress ends up bursting an aneurysm in his brain, I can dance on his grave, singing: I mean, he thinks that sexism is detrimental to society, so spreading lies and destroying people is justified in order to stop it. I think that discourse based on mud-slinging and falsehoods is detrimental to society.
You know who got things done?
Why not assassinate prominent racist and sexist politicians and intellectuals? Unless you do not believe there will ever be an opportunity to defect unpunished, you need this sort of social contract to take you at least some of the way.
Bullets, as you say, are neutral. In a war, a real war, a war for survival, you use all the weapons in your arsenal because you assume the enemy will use all the weapons in theirs.
Because you understand that it IS a war. There are a lot of things I am tempted to say to this.
You can get most of this from Hobbesbut this blog post will be shorter.Comments: Comment by Victor, 28 May, In your "Sensing Murder" articles the allegedly rebuttals are technically ‘inadmissible’.
They are not worth anything. The categorical imperative (German: kategorischer Imperativ) is the central philosophical concept in the deontological moral philosophy of Immanuel timberdesignmag.comuced in Kant's Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, it may be defined as a way of evaluating motivations for action..
According to Kant, sentient beings occupy a special place in creation, and morality can be summed up in an.
Religion and Science. Return to Top; The following article by Albert Einstein appeared in the New York Times Magazine on November 9, pp It has been reprinted in Ideas and Opinions, Crown Publishers, Inc.
, pp 36 - It also appears in Einstein's book The World as I See It, Philosophical Library, New York, , pp. 24 - Everything that the human race has done and thought is.
Epistemology. Epistemology is the study of timberdesignmag.commologists concern themselves with a number of tasks, which we might sort into two categories. First, we must determine the nature of knowledge; that is, what does it mean to say that someone knows, or fails to know, something?
This is a matter of understanding what knowledge is, and how to distinguish between cases in which someone. Two recent writers, Mr. J. M. Robertson and Professor Stoll of the University of Minnesota, have issued small books which can be praised for moving in the other direction.
Mr. Stoll performs a service in recalling to our attention the labours of the critics of the seventeenth and eighteenth. About the Text of the printed book. The text of William Kingdon Clifford’s “The Ethics of Belief” is based upon the first edition of Lectures and Essays, Macmillan and Co., , edited by Leslie Stephen and Frederick timberdesignmag.com text of William James’ “The Will to Believe” is based upon the first edition of The Will to Believe and other essays in popular philosophy, Longmans.